Flow library › Ethics & Policy
Ethics & Policy
Automation recipes filed under Ethics & Policy.
Ethics & Policy
Don't Let Your AI Agents Run Wild: A Policy Field Report
TriggerA policy-relevant decision point in an agentic workflow, such as an agent proposing an external action, accessing sensitive data, or escalating a request beyond its original scope.
ActionEvaluate the proposed step against a written policy, classify it as allowed, allowed-with-review, or blocked, and route it to the appropriate human or automated path.
Agentic systems are moving from answering questions to taking actions.
Ethics & Policy
AI Automation Isn't Ethical — Your Governance Design Is
TriggerA decision point where an automated system's output could affect a person's rights, access, finances, safety, or reputation, or where the system's behavior becomes ambiguous or contested.
ActionApply a documented governance review: classify the decision's risk tier, check the automation against pre-agreed policy rules, route the case to a human reviewer when thresholds are met, and log the outcome for audit.
Automation does not arrive with a moral compass.
Ethics & Policy
RPA vs. Agentic AI: Which Automation Wins on Ethics?
TriggerA decision to automate a task involving data handling, customer interaction, or document processing where ethical risk (bias, privacy, transparency, accountability) must be weighed against efficiency gains.
ActionCompare RPA (rule-based, deterministic) and agentic AI (goal-driven, probabilistic) approaches across ethical dimensions such as transparency, accountability, bias, privacy, and human oversight, then select the approach that best fits the task's risk profile.
Automation teams increasingly face a choice that looks technical but is fundamentally ethical: should a given task be handled by robotic process automation, which follows explicit rules, or by agentic AI, which pursues goals with some autonomy? RPA is deterministic.
Ethics & Policy
Why Your First AI Agent Needs a Human in the Loop—Not More Autonomy
TriggerA user or system event that initiates a task the agent is intended to handle, such as an incoming request, a scheduled check, or a status change.
ActionThe agent drafts, classifies, retrieves, or recommends a next step, then routes the result to a human reviewer for approval before any consequential change is made.
The first instinct when building an AI agent is to give it more freedom.
Ethics & Policy
The EU AI Act Won't Kill Agentic AI—But It Should Shape Your Governance
TriggerA new or amended EU AI Act obligation, guidance document, or conformity requirement becomes relevant to an AI system already in production or procurement.
ActionRun a structured AI governance review that classifies each system by risk tier, documents intended purpose and human oversight, and routes high-risk cases to a human review board before deployment or renewal.
The EU AI Act is often framed as a threat to agentic AI, as though regulation and autonomy cannot coexist.